+/*=========================================================================
+
+ Program: gdcm
+ Module: $RCSfile: TestWriteSimple.cxx,v $
+ Language: C++
+ Date: $Date: 2004/11/16 04:26:18 $
+ Version: $Revision: 1.5 $
+
+ Copyright (c) CREATIS (Centre de Recherche et d'Applications en Traitement de
+ l'Image). All rights reserved. See Doc/License.txt or
+ http://www.creatis.insa-lyon.fr/Public/Gdcm/License.html for details.
+
+ This software is distributed WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even
+ the implied warranty of MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR
+ PURPOSE. See the above copyright notices for more information.
+
+=========================================================================*/
#include "gdcm.h"
int main(int argc, char* argv[])
std::string header = argv[1];
const char *output = argv[2];
- gdcmHeader *f1 = new gdcmHeader( header );
- gdcmFile *f2 = new gdcmFile( f1 );
+ gdcm::Header *f1 = new gdcm::Header( header );
+ gdcm::File *f2 = new gdcm::File( f1 );
// If the following call is important, then the API sucks. Why is it
// required to allocate PixelData when we are not using it !?
- void* PixelData = f2->GetImageData(); //EXTREMELY IMPORTANT
+ uint8_t* PixelData = f2->GetImageData(); //EXTREMELY IMPORTANT
//Otherwise ReadPixel == -1 -> the dicom writing fails completely
int dataSize = f2->GetImageDataSize();
f2->WriteDcmExplVR( output );
- delete[] imageData;
delete f1;
delete f2;
//delete PixelData; //Does GetImageData return the same pointer ?